|
John Miller conducted a Health Management program for The
Group in February 2012.
6 people, completed the following
profiles: -
■
Health, Fitness and Wellbeing
■
Musculo-skeletal risk
The results are presented in graphic format, with
commentary.
Click here to read what the assessments are all about
HEALTH, FITNESS AND WELLBEING PROFILE
The
Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile
provides people with a very good idea of how well the various systems of
the body are functioning, particularly the
the mind
autonomic nervous system
immune system
digestive system
circulatory system
elimination system
musculo-skeletal system.
A
good score is a low score. A poor score is a high score.
| |
|
Symptom |
None |
Not much |
A fair bit |
A lot |
|
| |
1. |
Headaches including migraines |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
2. |
Lack of energy and vitality |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
3. |
Candida - jock itch, thrush, tinea
... |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
4. |
Poor sleep. If on tablets score 10 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
5. |
Snoring &/or sleep apnoea.
Score 10 if using a mask |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
6. |
Crook back, stiff neck, sore shoulders,
dicky knee RSI ... |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
7. |
Frequent colds, flu, sinus |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
8. |
Unsettled stomach, reflux (Score
10 if on medication) |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
9. |
Overweight - 1 point for every 2Kg |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
10. |
Irritable bowel, constipation |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
11. |
Asthma |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
12. |
Low level of aerobic fitness |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
13. |
Chest pain, palpitations |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
14. |
Rashes, itchiness, skin outbreaks, psoriasis ... |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
15. |
Mouth ulcers, cold sores |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
16. |
Elevated blood pressure. Score 0
on pills |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
17. |
Elevated blood cholesterol. Score o if on pills |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
18. |
Elevated blood glucose. Score 0 if
on medication |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
19. |
Shakes, nervous ticks, mannerisms |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
20. |
Grinding teeth |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
21. |
Alcoholic drinks per day (2
pts/drink) |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
22. |
Smoking. (1 pt/cigarette/day) |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
23. |
Caffeine (1 pt/cup per day) |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
24. |
Anxious about life, insecure,
apprehensive |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
25. |
Sad or depressed (On medication,
score 0) |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
26. |
In wrong job for now |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
27. |
Under-appreciated at work |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
28. |
Have poor work/life balance |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
29. |
Unhappy with family
life |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
| |
30. |
Unhappy with financial status |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
The score of a normal, fit and healthy
human being is less than 20
Higher scores are symptomatic
of dysfunction of one or more body systems.
People with high levels of
stress usually score well over 100.
For people with a score of more
than 80, the background noise of their life is becoming louder and
louder. It is hard to concentrate on your work when body systems are
dysfunctional.
We know a fit and healthy group
when we see the majority of scores below 40. This was not the case with
this group. By and large higher scores are usually a reflection of
low levels of fitness
an inability to deal with what life and
work are serving up to people.
Remember, it is not what
happens, but how we deal with what happens that determines our level of
stress.

Classification of average scores: Excellent - less
than 40. Good - 41 - 50. Fair 51-60. Poor - over 60.
This profile is described as very poor.
The
average score was
93.
This is a highly stressed, unfit group.
Anyone scoring more than 80 is putting up with a lot of 'background
noise'.
HEALTH CLIMATE SURVEY
Based on scores received in the
Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile we've compiled a Health Climate Survey. Scores on each item
have ranked - the
higher the score the worse the problem. We added
the scores for each item. The results appear in the table below.
| |
Symptoms/ issues / concerns |
% of people scoring over 5 |
No. of people scoring 10 |
|
|
|
Poor sleep |
80 |
|
|
|
|
Musculo-skeletal dysfunction |
60 |
1 |
|
|
|
Elevated cholesterol |
60 |
1 |
|
|
|
Grinding teeth |
60 |
|
|
|
|
Depressed |
60 |
1 |
|
|
|
Snoring, sleep apnoea |
40 |
|
|
|
|
Overweight |
40 |
|
|
|
|
Elevated blood pressure |
40 |
2 |
|
|
|
Elevated glucose |
40 |
|
|
|
|
High caffeine intake |
40 |
|
|
|
|
Under appreciated at work |
40 |
2 |
|
|
|
Poor financial status |
40 |
|
|
|
|
Lack of Energy |
20 |
|
|
|
|
Reflux, unsettled stomach |
20 |
1 |
|
|
|
Irritable bowel, constipation etc |
20 |
1 |
|
|
|
Low level of fitness |
20 |
|
|
|
|
Chest pain, palpitations |
20 |
|
|
|
|
Shakes, nervous mannerisms |
20 |
|
|
|
|
Anxious |
20 |
|
|
|
|
Headaches |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Candida |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Frequent colds, flu, sinus |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Shortness of breath from asthma |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Itchy, rashes, psoriasis |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Mouth ulcers |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Alcohol intake |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Smoking |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Wrong job |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Work-life balance |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
Unhappy family life |
0 |
|
|
We registered those scores of 5 and over as being a
symptom, issue or concern, the most pressing of which have been
highlighted.
Perception
Based on people's perception (where they gave a
particular symptom a score of 5 or more, and backed up by objective
scores) the key issues are
|
|
Obesity
40% of people
said they were more than 10Kg over weight. It's a symptom of
metabolic dysfunction and relates to high energy diets and low
energy lifestyles. It's suggestive of elevated levels of insulin
floating around the body, which is a precursor of all manner of
body system dysfunctions - elevated blood pressure, elevated
cholesterol, elevated blood glucose.
The recommendation, that people need to get more
exercise (at lunch time) and eat from the top of the Hourglass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Musculo-skeletal dysfunction
60% of people
said they had some sort of musculo-skeletal dysfunction.
Musculo-skeletal dysfunction goes with low levels of strength
and flexibility. Those at greatest
risk need encouragement to attend a strength and flexibility
training program several times a week. |
|
|
|
|
|
Under-appreciation at
work
40% said they
were under-appreciated at work. Surprising really when they all
said they were in the right job. Sounds like some sort of a
management problem! There is usually
a high and positive correlation between people being in the
wrong job and people saying they are under-appreciated at work.
In this case this rule did not apply. |
|
|
|
|
|
Being in the wrong job
Nobody
of people
said they were in the wrong job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depression and anxiety
60% of people said they were depreessed. There is an epidemic of depression in our
community and we encourage all organisations to target depression.
One
person was on
anti-depressant medication.
There is a significant core of depression that relates to poor health
generally.
All body systems are connected. The
epidemic of depression will continue to escalate at the same rate as the
epidemic of all other body system dysfunctions. People need to be given
encouragement to exercise regularly and vigorous, eat less flour and
sugar and imbibe less of the culturally chemicals - particularly
nicotine, caffeine and alcohol.
Because of the relationship of depression
to fitness and diet there is a chance that some people have been
misdiagnosed.
Some aspects of depression relate to
psychologically generated issues. It is important that these
people be encouraged to have regular counselling - through the EAP or
other counsellors -
The best book that I've
read about
depression and what you can do about it, and one that I
recommend highly is by psychiatrist, David Servan-Schreiber,
Healing Without Freud or Prozac.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood pressure
2 people indicated they were on blood pressure medication.
Blood pressure is a symptom of body system
dysfunction relating directly to
- lack of aerobic fitness
- being over weight
- being stressed.
It's definitely not due to a lack of Avpro!
|
MUSCULO-SKELETAL RISK FACTOR
Our musculo-skeletal risk factor profile looked at
a range of parameters including mobility, strength and flexibility and
whether people are training to keep themselves strong and flexible.
The musculo-skeletal risk factor profile is
comprised of a mix of 7 objective and 3 subjective assessments.
Current
musculo-skeletal condition
Closeness to ideal
weight
Leg strength
Abdominal strength
test
Upper body
strength test
Flexibility
Functional mobility the ability to sit
down and stand up with ease.
Shoulder function
Flexibility training behaviour
Strength training behaviour
Strength training behaviour
The 'pass mark' for each parameter is 7/10.
A score of 70% is readily attainable by those who have a
regular and systematic training program.
Those scoring less than 70 are not doing
sufficient in the way of strength and flexibility exercises. They are
therefore exposing themselves to a high risk of musculo-skeletal
dysfunction. (It would be bizarre for a workplace to offer to pay the
rehabilitation costs of people who were not keeping themselves strong
enough or flexible enough to do their job without succumbing to
musculo-skeletal dysfunction, wouldn't it?)
A good score is a high score. A
poor score is a low score.
 |
|
 |
|
A poor result. Those scoring less the 6 need to be required attend a
prehab/rehab program, for their own benefit and that of the
organisation. |
|
As a
group this is a better than normal result. 2 people were over
weight. Being overweight greatly
compromises mobility and increases risk of lower back pain. |
 |
|
 |
|
This is a poor result. 3 people couldn't squat
down once. |
|
This is a poor result. 50% of people couldn't do one sit up.
Low levels of strength in the muscles on the front of the body
exposes people to an inability to keep the pelvis and spinal column in
good alignment. |
 |
|
 |
|
This is
a mediocre result.
60% of people failed the test. This test exposes people with weak muscles on the back
side of their body. They are leaving themselves open to back,
shoulder and arm dysfunction. |
|
This is a poor result. 50% of people couldn't touch their toes at
all. Too many people have tight
muscles along the back side of their body - calves, hamstrings,
buttock and back. It's caused by two things - sitting down and
not having a flexibility training program. There is a high risk of lower
back, neck and shoulder dysfunction. |
 |
|
 |
|
A better result. Being overweight and having a game leg, dicky knee, bung hip and a crook
back dramatically reduces mobility. |
|
Patchy. 30%
had dysfunctional shoulders. The good news is that's it's
redeemable. |
 |
|
 |
|
Its
always the case, few people have a regular strength and
flexibility program. The organisation needs to put in train
a regular and systematic training program, on site, that
includes
1. specialist prehab and rehab sessions for
those at serious risk and those already dysfunctional.
2. daily 10 minute strength and flexibility sessions
for all staff. |
|
 |
|
Average score: 43.
Not good. The risk of musculo-skeletal dysfunction is high due to low
levels of strength and flexibility. There is a strong case for
the organisation to implement an obligatory strength and
flexibility program for those who scored less than 60 in this
profile. |
Lack of strength
and flexibility is something that the Organisation needs to take
seriously and monitor carefully and put in place an
organisation-wide strategy to improve musculo-skeletal function. By far
and away a high proportion of people do not have a strength and
flexibility program. As a result they are getting weaker and tighter by
the week, thereby exposing themselves and the organisation to risk.
When
push comes to shove and people become dysfunctional, it will be The
Organisation that ends up paying the high cost of an avoidable
musculo-skeletal complaint.
Click here to read the article
from injury to dysfunction.
Click here to read
about swifties and fallacies.
In our opinion musculo-skeletal dysfunction
caused by the lack of a regular and systematic strength and flexibility
program cannot be classified as an injury. Responsibility for
musculo-skeletal dysfunction needs to be sheeted home to individual
employees, though its unlikely to happen without the establishment of a
culture within the organisation that supports, values and understands
strength and flexibility.
We recommend a range of strength and flexibility
classes that are readily available Australia-wide: -
|
|
Posture and
Flexibility |
|
|
Yoga
|
|
|
Crookback Clinic |
|
|
Tai Chi |
|
|
Pontius Pilates |
The Organisation would place itself in the
forefront of OH&S practice if it took the musculo-skeletal risk
seriously and moved heaven and earth to educate all staff about
this risk and encourage them to take part in a regular strength and
flexibility program. Maybe The Organisation and its worker's
compensation insurer could invest in a pilot program to increase staff
strength and flexibility!
The
lack of strength and flexibility training coupled with poor abdominal strength, upper body strength, flexibility
and shoulder
function is a cause for
concern and needs the attention of individual staff and managers.
Recommendation
We strongly recommend that
the people who are in current poor musculo-skeletal condition, and who lack abdominal
strength, upper body strength, flexibility, shoulder
function and functional mobility, in particular
those who scored less than 60
on the profile, be obligated to attend regular,
in-house strength and flexibility classes.
The pressure on the
organisation's workers' compensation costs is such that to do otherwise
would, in our opinion be to abrogate a responsibility for the prudent
management of the organisation's finances.
RECOMMENDATIONS
See the generic list of recommendations that
cover all our profiles.
|